| What
is School Wide Positive Behavior Support?
School
Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) is a multi-tiered prevention-intervention
model that provides a continuum of positive behavioral support
strategies in school settings. SWPBS fosters positive school
environments so that all students, most particularly students
with disabilities, can be successfully included within general
education programs. SWPBS is comprised of three levels
of intervention implementation: universal, secondary, and
individualized. While the three intervention tiers build
upon one another, each tier has a specific intervention focus
and process for implementation.

Adapted from
Walker , H.M., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague,
J.R., Bricker, D., & Kaufman, M.J. (1996). Integrated
approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among
school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders, 4 , pp. 194-209.
Universal
Interventions
Interventions
at the universal level are for all students,
staff, and settings in the school building. All students,
most particularly students with disabilities, benefit from
explicit teaching and reinforcement of appropriate behaviors.
Supported by research on effective instructional environments
and empirical demonstrations of application in public schools,
the universal intervention offers schools a preventative approach
to behavior and discipline problems. Universal interventions
are guided by a core leadership team made up of school stakeholder
representation. The team works collaboratively with the school
community to identify priorities and design contextually appropriate
interventions. The universal intervention consists of seven
essential program components: (1) a representative leadership
team, (2) a self assessment process, (3) a discipline data
management and decision making system, (4) clearly defined
behavioral expectations, (5) a school wide student/staff acknowledgement
system, (6) a process for teaching behavioral expectations,
and (7) a system for interacting effectively with the school
community. High fidelity implementation of these program
components relies on active and direct involvement of the
building administrator(s) to make implementation a priority
for the school.
See
examples of universal interventions
Secondary
Interventions
Secondary
interventions are designed for students who need more support
than provided through universal interventions. Typically
the need for secondary interventions is evidenced by repeated
office discipline referrals in short periods of time (e.g.,
3 office discipline referrals in a month or marking period).
Students in need of a secondary level intervention often benefit
from additional structure, support, and instruction to navigate
social environments successfully. Secondary interventions
can be applied in a small group format and consist of function
based supports (e.g., instruction, behavior contracting, mentoring,
check in/out systems). Coordination and implementation
of secondary interventions are often embedded within the school's
pre-referral process. Secondary interventions consist of five
critical components: (1) a screening process and criteria
for identifying students in need, (2) an assessment of need,
(3) function based skill instruction, (4) behavioral contracting,
and (5) ongoing mentoring.
See
examples of secondary interventions
Individualized
Interventions
Individualized
interventions are for students who require the most intensive
level of intervention and support. These are students
who have repeated patterns of behavioral difficulties that
affect their opportunity to be educated successfully within
general education settings. In New
Jersey , individualized interventions are determined for students
with disabilities through the IEP team collaborative planning
process that includes conducting a functional behavioral assessment
and design of a behavior intervention plan. Interventions
and supports are designed based on a thorough understanding
of behavioral function and the factors contributing to behavioral
occurrence. The individualized intervention process
consists of three main phases: (1) an individualized functional
behavioral assessment that includes direct observation of
the student in school settings; (2) the development of a function-based,
multi-component intervention plan that includes proactive
strategies (setting event and antecedent interventions), replacement
skill instruction, response and reinforcement strategies;
and (3) on going plan monitoring and modification.
See
examples of individualized interventions
|